You fixed it last week. It broke again this week.
Regressions eat the sprint. A fix ships, the bug returns two releases later, and without regression coverage there’s no telling a real fix from a lucky one.
✓ Fractional QA for AI-native startups
A working demo isn’t a reliable feature. AI outputs shift every run, regressions slip back in, and there’s rarely clean proof a change helped.
I install the complete QA function for AI-native startups: evals, prompt regression, CI gates, and senior release judgment. That’s what turns “ready to ship” into a call you can back with evidence.
$ vireo eval run --suite release
▸ golden dataset ......... ok
▸ prompt regression ...... ok
✗ FAIL✓ PASS injection.safety 0 leaks
✓ PASS eval.coverage complete
✓ PASS cost.guardrails within budget
● release.gate green build 10+ years across regulated gaming and AI-native SaaS
✓ the 2am problem
Three things break AI-native teams. You’ve felt all three.
Regressions eat the sprint. A fix ships, the bug returns two releases later, and without regression coverage there’s no telling a real fix from a lucky one.
AI outputs change from one deploy to the next. Spot-checking a few by eye can’t catch a model that’s quietly, confidently wrong, or prove a prompt change actually helped.
With no gates, evals, or clear owner, quality falls to whoever clicks through before release, a hard place to improve from, because nothing’s being measured yet.
✓ three tiers, one ladder
Each tier feeds the next. Start small, prove value, expand. No open-ended hourly, ever.
$3,000 USD fixed
1–2 weeks · risk map + 90-day roadmap
A clear-eyed read of your repo, CI, release process, and AI-feature risk. You get the roadmap whether or not we work together again.
See what's included$15,000 USD range $12k–$20k by scope
30–45 days · the AI-quality system installed
Eval harness, prompt regression suites, injection-safety tests, CI gates, and a QA operating model. Playwright and CI are the included foundation; the AI-testing layer is the value.
See what's includedfrom $4,500/mo USD ~1–2 days/week
3-month min, then month-to-month
Your QA lead on retainer: framework upkeep, PR and test reviews, release sign-offs, eval monitoring, and quarterly strategy, for a fraction of a full-time hire.
See what's included✓ how it works
Two weeks. I review your repo, CI, release process, and AI features, then hand you a risk map and a prioritized 90-day roadmap. You keep it whether or not we work together again.
30–45 days. I install the AI-quality system: eval harness, prompt regression suites, injection-safety tests, CI gates, and a QA operating model your engineers will actually follow.
Ongoing. I stay on as your QA lead (maintaining the framework, reviewing PRs, signing off releases, watching evals) for a fraction of a full-time hire.
✓ the operator
I’m Matt, an SDET / QA architect with 10+ years owning quality end-to-end across consumer SaaS, enterprise web, and high-stakes regulated platforms. I currently build the entire quality function for an AI-native, multi-tenant SaaS platform: TypeScript + Playwright across three apps, a tRPC API, and a full CI matrix on GitHub Actions.
Before that, five years on a multi-jurisdictional gaming platform serving 300+ casino locations across 7+ jurisdictions, zero-tolerance for defects, 100% compliance record. I’ve built a team’s first-ever QA system from nothing, and I bring that playbook to yours.
QA accelerates, never blocks. Build in, don’t bolt on. Automate the repeatable. Catch it where it’s cheap.
Read the full story✓ proof
Testimonials land here as the first audits and sprints complete. Until then, the proof is the work: the method on the LLM testing page, the writing on the blog, and a free diagnostic you can run right now.
Score your readiness in 3 minutes✓ objections, answered
You should, eventually. But a senior SDET is ~$160k plus four months of ramp building a framework from scratch on your dime. I install a working framework and process in 30–45 days at a fraction of the cost, and when you do hire, they inherit something that works instead of a blank repo. I’ll even help you write the job spec.
AI is why I’m fast, it’s a force multiplier on top of judgment, not a replacement for it. Someone still has to decide what to test, what “good” means for your LLM outputs, and what’s safe to ship. That judgment layer is the product. The tools are commodities; the decisions are not.
You build golden datasets, write evals that score outputs against them, run prompt regression suites so a prompt change can’t silently break behavior, add injection-safety and cost guardrails, and wire all of it into CI as release gates. The full method is on the LLM testing page.
Hourly pays me to be slow. Fixed price pays me to be good. Every package has a defined scope, deliverables, and price. No open-ended meters. If something falls outside scope, it becomes its own small fixed-price engagement.
I’m stack-agnostic; the patterns travel, so I fit into whatever you already run. I’m deepest in Playwright (TypeScript and Python/pytest) across web, API (REST/SOAP), database, mobile (Appium), accessibility (axe), visual, performance, and CI (GitHub Actions or your provider). For AI features: evals, prompt regression, output validation, injection safety, and API cost monitoring.
Fully remote, based in Calgary, Canada. I work North American and European hours, so your test runs are triaged before standup. You get my hours and response times in writing at kickoff.
✓ free checklist
A 25-point self-assessment for shipping AI features without breaking prod. Enter your email and I’ll send it over, plus the occasional Green Builds email (one a month, no fluff).
One email a month. Unsubscribe anytime. Or read it right now.
Book a 20-minute intro call. I’ll tell you honestly whether I can help and what the right next step is: audit, sprint, or nothing yet.